<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The History of Redemption by Nathan E. Lewis</title>
	<link>http://nathanlewis.org/2009/02/09/the-history-of-redemption/</link>
	<description>living the gospel</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nathan E. Lewis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Bible: not your typical book of religion</title>
		<link>http://nathanlewis.org/2009/02/09/the-history-of-redemption/#comment-185006</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nathanlewis.org/2009/02/09/the-history-of-redemption/#comment-185006</guid>
					<description>[...] living the gospel  &#160;&#160;Home &#160;&#160;The Gospel &#160;&#160;Missions &#160;&#160;Sermons &#160;&#160;Bible Studies         &#171; The History of Redemption by Nathan E. Lewis  For Freedom Christ Has Set Us Free: A True Story (Except for the Props) &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] living the gospel  &nbsp;&nbsp;Home &nbsp;&nbsp;The Gospel &nbsp;&nbsp;Missions &nbsp;&nbsp;Sermons &nbsp;&nbsp;Bible Studies         &laquo; The History of Redemption by Nathan E. Lewis  For Freedom Christ Has Set Us Free: A True Story (Except for the Props) &raquo; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathanlewis.org/2009/02/09/the-history-of-redemption/#comment-116789</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 04:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nathanlewis.org/2009/02/09/the-history-of-redemption/#comment-116789</guid>
					<description>thanks, Mike. These paragraphs are designed to teach children the continuity of redemptive history rather than to present a systematic theology, which is also important for us all. Were I to unpack my choice of words in the "Christ paragraph," then I would explain the central doctrine of atonement latent in the word, "save," and in the final clause, "to perfectly keep the covenant and thus win the Father’s favor for all of us." Indeed the meaning of atonement is imbedded in the covenant work of Jesus Christ satisfying the Father's just wrath for sin. The atonement looms large in my gospel preaching and I assure you that in no way am I attempting to skirt the issue of propitiation, atonement, or satisfaction. -funny how we can take a fine, biblical word like "atonement" and make it a buzz word or a "shiboleth" to falsely assure that we are all orthodox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, Mike. These paragraphs are designed to teach children the continuity of redemptive history rather than to present a systematic theology, which is also important for us all. Were I to unpack my choice of words in the &#8220;Christ paragraph,&#8221; then I would explain the central doctrine of atonement latent in the word, &#8220;save,&#8221; and in the final clause, &#8220;to perfectly keep the covenant and thus win the Father’s favor for all of us.&#8221; Indeed the meaning of atonement is imbedded in the covenant work of Jesus Christ satisfying the Father&#8217;s just wrath for sin. The atonement looms large in my gospel preaching and I assure you that in no way am I attempting to skirt the issue of propitiation, atonement, or satisfaction. -funny how we can take a fine, biblical word like &#8220;atonement&#8221; and make it a buzz word or a &#8220;shiboleth&#8221; to falsely assure that we are all orthodox.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: M. E. J. M.</title>
		<link>http://nathanlewis.org/2009/02/09/the-history-of-redemption/#comment-116753</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 11:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nathanlewis.org/2009/02/09/the-history-of-redemption/#comment-116753</guid>
					<description>Otherwise this is great, but where is the Atonement? While I agree that it is because of the righteousness of Christ that God accepts him as our mediator, his righteousness also makes his sacrificial death acceptable as the atonement for our sins. It is Christ's duty to be righteous, but it is his humiliation, suffering and death which is the atonement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Otherwise this is great, but where is the Atonement? While I agree that it is because of the righteousness of Christ that God accepts him as our mediator, his righteousness also makes his sacrificial death acceptable as the atonement for our sins. It is Christ&#8217;s duty to be righteous, but it is his humiliation, suffering and death which is the atonement.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

